|
Intercultural philosophy (or sometimes world philosophy) is an approach to philosophy that had its precursors in the past but has started as a concept in the 1980s. It mostly emanates from the German-speaking parts of Europe and can be seen as a need to factor other cultures into one's own philosophical thinking and thus creating an intercultural perspective.〔Chini, Tina “Interkulturelle Philosophie – Disziplin, Orientierung, Praxis?” ''polylog'' 12 (2004): 120-131.〕 == The idea of intercultural philosophy == In the long history of philosophical thought there has always been a claim for universality although many great thinkers from the past see philosophical value only in the western tradition and oversee what other parts of the world have achieved on their own over the centuries. Eurocentric philosophers such as Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel agree upon Greek being the only birthplace of philosophy and traditions such as the Chinese or Indian ones are only teachings of wisdom.〔Wimmer, Franz Martin (2004). ''Interkulturelle Philosophie.'' Vienna: UTB.〕 Others speak of more than one birthplace and include Asian traditions.〔Mall, Ram Adhar et al. (1989). ''Die drei Geburtsorte der Philosophie. China, Indien, Europa.'' Bonn: Bouvier.〕 Karl Jaspers, a German psychiatrist and philosopher, developed the theory of an axial age, referring to the period from 800 BCE to 200 BCE, during which philosophical thinking evolved in China, Indian and the Occident.〔〔Mall, Ram Adhar (2000). ''Intercultural Philosophy.'' Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.〕 Jasper's theory is widely accepted by those philosophising interculturally. In contrast to any eurocentrism there are those philosophers who believe that there needs to be communication as well as collaboration between different traditions and cultures especially in today's global situation,〔〔〔Kimmerle, Heinz (1994). ''Die Dimension des Interkulturellen.'' Amsterdam: Rodopi.〕〔Yousefi, Hamid Reza et al. (2005). ''Grundpositionen der interkulturellen Philosophie.'' Nordhausen: Traugott Bautz.〕 given that intercultural interactions and encounters are a fact of human existence.〔Furtado, Gabriel Vincent “Intercultural Conflict in Asian Philosophy” in: Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl (Ed.). ''Unterwegs zur interkulturellen Philosophie.'' Frankfurt: IKO (1998).〕 The goal is to extend one's thinking into including other cultures, to not only consider one tradition but as many as possible such as Asian, Latin-American,〔 Islamic, or African.〔 It is no longer important to ask questions on your own for this would be a very regional approach. Intercultural philosophy shouldn't be an academic subject besides others but an attitude followed by everybody who philosophises.〔〔 No matter what philosophical orientation, other culture's thoughts should be taken into consideration.〔 For Raimon Panikkar it is also important to connect religion and philosophy as they are both key elements of human reality and important to many cultures.〔Panikkar, Raimon (2000). Religion, Philosophie und Kultur." ''polylog'' 1 (1998): 13-37.〕 When developing an approach to intercultural philosophy one has to abandon the idea of using only one's own ways of demonstration and description but has to include other forms such as dance, music, architecture, rituals, art, literature, myths, proverbs, folk tales and so on.〔〔Amaladass, Ananad “Literarische Formen des Philosophierens” ''polylog'' 15 (2006): 7-17.〕 A manner of meeting has to be found to allow a variety of exchange where one's own tradition can be preserved and not be forged into one big syncretism.〔 The only way to stop cultures from being absorbed by globalisation and becoming something of a world culture, which is monoculturally predetermined, according to Fornet-Betancort, is the project of an intercultural dialogue.〔Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl (2000) (Philosophical Presuppositions of Intercultural Dialogue ) online at ''polylog: platform for Intercultural Philosophy.'' Retrieved 2010-09-07〕 Others view China and Japan as an example of intercultural practise that others could learn from as they have managed to integrate Buddhism without losing their own cultural identity.〔Furtado, Gabriel Vincent “Asian Perspectives For the Development of Intercultural Thought” in: Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl (Ed.). ''Kulturen der Philosophie.'' Aachen: 1996.〕 Philosophers such as Wimmer and Mall postulate forms of dialogue in which all parties are on the same level ('Ebene der Gleichheit') without having any other power but the better argument.〔〔〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Intercultural philosophy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|